Mirax Casino vs KatsuBet
On the figures we can verify, neither bonus can be priced. Mirax's archived terms state 35x and KatsuBet's 45x, but neither says what the multiplier is applied to — the bonus alone, or deposit plus bonus — and that clause decides the cost. We leave both unpriced rather than assume a base. What can be said is bounded: at a 4% house edge no base breaks even above 25x, so both sit past break-even whichever base applies, and the bonus is a cost either way. On a shared base 35x would be the lighter requirement, but nothing in either set of terms says the bases are shared. If you are not claiming a bonus, the wagering terms stop applying, and we have verified nothing else that separates the two: no licensing detail, no complaint record, no published payout times. Read the live terms before depositing.
| On a £100 deposit, 100% match | Mirax Casino | KatsuBet |
|---|---|---|
| ProvenPayouts Score | 7.0/10 (Solid) | 7.4/10 (Solid) |
| Wagering (from its own terms) | 35× | 45× |
| Applies to | — | — |
| Break-even on that base | — | — |
| Turnover owed | — | — |
| Expected cost to clear | — | — |
| Realistic value | Cannot be priced | Cannot be priced |
| Terms snapshot | 2026-05-12 | 2022-11-30 |
| Established | 2022 | 2020 |
Every figure above is computed from the operator's own archived terms and the model published at /bonus-break-even, at a 4% house edge. “Not published” and “not readable” are findings, not omissions — where an operator does not state a term, or serves it from a page an archive cannot read, that is said rather than filled in.
Mirax Casino
A newer 7Bit sister brand with a big welcome package, but the flagged bonus clause and hold complaints keep it mid-pack. Editorial assessment, not first-hand tested.
KatsuBet
Reliable-for-its-tier 7Bit sister brand with a strong resolution record; the friction is withdrawal-time verification. Editorial assessment, not first-hand tested.
Which bonus is actually cheaper to clear?
Neither set of terms lets us answer that, and the reason is the whole lesson of this page. Mirax's archived bonus terms, captured on 12 May 2026, state that the bonus must be wagered 35 times. KatsuBet's, captured on 30 November 2022, state 45 times. Both then say that wagering with bonus money and deposited cash counts towards the requirement. That sentence tells you which bets count; it does not tell you what the multiplier is applied to. The base is the half of the term that decides the bill: at a 100% match, a multiplier on deposit plus bonus owes twice the turnover of the same multiplier on the bonus alone. Without it, a cost to clear cannot be computed, so we do not publish one for either, and we do not choose a base on their behalf. The bounded statement is this. At a 4% house edge, break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and m/(h(1+m)) on deposit plus bonus, which is 12.5x at a 100% match and never above 25x at any match. Both 35x and 45x are therefore past break-even whichever base applies. If the two casinos use the same base, KatsuBet's 45x asks for 28.6% more turnover than Mirax's 35x; if they use different bases, the order can flip. Put your own figures, including the base you find in the live terms, through bonus calculator.
Does 45x versus 35x tell you the whole story?
No, and here it cannot, because the bases are unstated. Normally the multiplier alone tells you little, because the base it applies to decides the bill. Three operators in our archive-verified set state both halves and show why. BitStarz and mBit both wager 40x on the bonus alone. On a €100 deposit at a 100% match that is 40 x €100 = €4,000 of turnover, about €160 of expected cost. Vavada wagers 35x on the bonus alone: €3,500 of turnover, about €140. Put a 35x on deposit plus bonus instead and it becomes €7,000 of turnover and about €280: the same number printed on the page, twice the bill. A deposit-plus-bonus base at a 100% match exactly doubles the turnover, which is why break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and 12.5x on deposit plus bonus. Mirax and KatsuBet leave that half out, so their headline numbers are the start of the question, not the answer. Whenever you read a wagering requirement, find the base before you judge the multiplier. What 35x wagering means and what it costs you works through the mechanics.
How much weight should these wagering figures carry?
Both are quoted verbatim from the operators' own bonus-terms pages, retrieved through the Internet Archive and checked mechanically rather than paraphrased from an affiliate summary. That is the strongest sourcing available to us: casino edge networks refuse our requests, so live pages are not fetchable and the archive is the citable record. Its limitation is timing. An archived capture shows what the operator published when the crawler visited, not necessarily what sits on the page today, and welcome packages get rewritten more often than most other terms. We do not treat either figure as a claim about the current live offer, and neither should you. In practice that means one habit before depositing: open the live bonus terms and check two fields — the multiplier, and the base it applies to, bonus alone or deposit plus bonus. Those two decide the cost; the rest of the page is detail. Neither capture states the base, so if the live terms do, that is the clause to read first, because at a 100% match it halves or doubles the required turnover. Mirax Casino and KatsuBet carry the full quoted findings.
How fast does each one pay out?
We do not know, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. ProvenPayouts does not deposit, does not time cashouts and publishes no test logs, so no hours figure goes next to either name on this page. If another site quotes you one, ask what it was measured from and whether it can show the log behind it. Nor have we verified a published processing-time commitment, a verification turnaround or any queue data at either operator — the things you could actually hold a casino to. Their absence is a finding rather than an omission: nothing archive-verified separates Mirax from KatsuBet on payouts. What is worth knowing as general sector mechanics: crypto casinos of this type typically ask for no identity documents at signup and trigger verification at or near the first withdrawal, at their own discretion. That is where holds appear — when money is leaving, not when it is arriving. That is a pattern of the tier, not a Mirax or KatsuBet finding. Read each operator's own verification and withdrawal-limit terms, since a cap on bonus winnings can cost you more than the wagering multiple does.
What has ProvenPayouts not verified here?
Quite a lot, and listing it is fairer than filling the space. We have not verified either operator's licensing entity or corporate ownership, so we make no claim about whether the two are related. We have not verified game contribution tables, and they matter: where slots count in full and table games count a fraction, a clearing target that looks reachable on slots becomes unreachable at a live table. We have not verified maximum bonus size, minimum qualifying deposit, maximum cashout from bonus winnings, bet caps while wagering, bonus expiry windows, supported coin lists or library size at either operator. We hold no complaint statistics, safety index or resolution record for either, so nothing on this page ranks them on conduct. The ProvenPayouts Score is an editorial judgement formed from public information — not a measurement, not a test result — and we are not using it here to break a tie the evidence does not break. how we rank sets out how it is built. Where you need those missing fields, they are on the operators' own terms pages, and reading them takes less time than clearing a bonus does.
Who does each one actually suit?
If you have already decided to claim a welcome bonus, neither page of terms gives you the number you need: the base. Find it on each live bonus page before you choose, because it decides the bill more than 35x against 45x does. If both apply the multiplier to the same base, Mirax's 35x is the lighter requirement; if not, the order can flip, and we will not assume either way. We cannot hand you a verified reason to take KatsuBet over Mirax, or the reverse: on licensing, conduct record, catalogue and limits we have verified nothing that separates them. If you are not claiming the bonus at all, the multipliers never apply to you, and this page has nothing verified left to choose with; decide on the live terms and on what each operator publishes about limits and verification. Take neither if you were hoping the arithmetic would come out positive. It does not, at either, on either base: at 35x or 45x the bonus is a cost you agree to, not value you receive. Stake only what you can afford to lose.
Neither bonus can be priced from the terms we hold. Mirax publishes 35x and KatsuBet 45x, but neither says whether the multiplier applies to the bonus alone or to deposit plus bonus, so we leave both unpriced rather than choose a base. Both sit past break-even whichever base applies. If you are claiming a bonus, read the base on each live bonus page first; on a shared base Mirax's 35x is the lighter requirement. If you are not, we have verified nothing that separates them: no conduct record, no licensing detail, no published limits. That is a tie we cannot break. Read the live terms before you deposit.
FAQ
Is Mirax's 35x bonus worth taking?
Not on expectation, whichever base applies. Mirax's archived terms (12 May 2026) state 35x but not what it is applied to, so we cannot put a cost on it and do not assume a base. At a 4% house edge — the 96% RTP slots that bonus terms steer you towards — break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and 12.5x on deposit plus bonus at a 100% match, and never above 25x on either. 35x is past both lines, so the expected cost of clearing exceeds the bonus either way. Check the base on the live page before depositing: at a 100% match it halves or doubles the bill.
Why can 40x at another casino be cheaper than a 35x?
Because the base decides the cost, not the multiplier. BitStarz and mBit both wager 40x on the bonus alone. On a €100 deposit at a 100% match that is 40 x €100 = €4,000 of turnover, about €160 of expected cost at a 4% house edge. A 35x applied to deposit plus bonus would be 35 x €200 = €7,000, about €280: the larger headline number is the cheaper deal. Mirax's archived terms state 35x without saying which base applies, so whether its bonus is dearer or cheaper than BitStarz's cannot be settled from them. Break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and 12.5x on deposit plus bonus at a 100% match. break-even table sets out the full model.
What should I check on the live terms before depositing?
Two fields before anything else: the wagering multiplier, and the base it applies to — the bonus alone, or deposit plus bonus. Those decide what the bonus costs you, and a change of base at a 100% match halves or doubles the bill. After that, check game contribution (slots usually count in full, table and live games far less), any maximum cashout from bonus winnings, the maximum bet allowed while wagering, and the expiry window. ProvenPayouts has not verified those last four for Mirax or KatsuBet, so read them on the operator's own terms page rather than from any comparison site, this one included.
How quickly do Mirax and KatsuBet pay out?
We do not know, and we will not guess. ProvenPayouts does not deposit, does not time withdrawals and publishes no test logs, so no hours figure appears next to either name. We have also not verified any published processing-time commitment, verification turnaround or queue data at either operator — the things you could actually hold a casino to. Nothing archive-verified separates Mirax and KatsuBet on payouts, which is itself the finding. If a site quotes you a payout time for either, ask what it was measured from and whether it can show the log behind it.
How reliable are the wagering figures on this page?
Both are quoted verbatim from the operators' own bonus-terms pages, retrieved through the Internet Archive and checked mechanically rather than paraphrased from an affiliate summary. That is the strongest sourcing we have, because casino edge networks refuse our requests and the live pages are not fetchable to us. The limitation is timing: an archived capture shows what was published when the crawler visited, not necessarily what is live today, and welcome packages change. Treat both as sourced but dated, and read the live terms yourself — the multiplier, and the base it applies to — before you deposit.
What does ProvenPayouts not know about Mirax and KatsuBet?
A fair amount, and saying so is part of the point. We have not verified either operator's licensing entity or ownership, so we make no claim about whether they are related. We have not verified game contribution tables, maximum bonus size, minimum qualifying deposit, maximum cashout from bonus winnings, bet caps during wagering, bonus expiry, supported coins or library size. We hold no complaint statistics or safety ratings for either. What we do hold, verbatim from their own archived terms, is each wagering multiplier. Neither states the base it applies to, which is the field that decides what a bonus costs, so we leave both unpriced.
Other matchups with these two
18+ only. Editorial comparison from public data and archived operator terms — not a first-hand withdrawal test. ProvenPayouts may earn commission on sign-ups, and operators we cannot monetise stay in the ranking anyway.