Mirax Casino vs KatsuBet
On the figures we can verify, Mirax's bonus is the cheaper of the two to clear. Both wager on deposit plus bonus, so 35x against 45x compares directly: roughly €280 of expected clearing cost against €360 per €100 of bonus, at a 4% house edge. Cheaper is not cheap — break-even on that base at a 100% match is 12.5x, and both sit well beyond it, so the bonus is a cost either way. If you are not claiming a bonus, the wagering terms stop applying, and we have verified nothing else that separates the two: no licensing detail, no complaint record, no published payout times. Read the live terms before depositing.
| On a £100 deposit, 100% match | Mirax Casino | KatsuBet |
|---|---|---|
| ProvenPayouts Score | 7.0/10 (Solid) | 7.4/10 (Solid) |
| Wagering (from its own terms) | 35× | 45× |
| Applies to | Deposit + bonus | Deposit + bonus |
| Break-even on that base | 12.5× | 12.5× |
| Turnover owed | £7,000 | £9,000 |
| Expected cost to clear | £280 | £360 |
| Realistic value | −£180 | −£260 |
| Terms snapshot | 2026-05-12 | 2022-11-30 |
| Established | 2022 | 2020 |
Every figure above is computed from the operator's own archived terms and the model published at /bonus-break-even, at a 4% house edge. “Not published” and “not readable” are findings, not omissions — where an operator does not state a term, or serves it from a page an archive cannot read, that is said rather than filled in.
Mirax Casino
A newer 7Bit sister brand with a big welcome package, but the flagged bonus clause and hold complaints keep it mid-pack. Editorial assessment, not first-hand tested.
KatsuBet
Reliable-for-its-tier 7Bit sister brand with a strong resolution record; the friction is withdrawal-time verification. Editorial assessment, not first-hand tested.
Which bonus is actually cheaper to clear?
This pair is unusually clean, because both operators apply their multiplier to the same base. KatsuBet's archived bonus terms state 45x, calculated on deposit plus bonus. Mirax's state 35x on that same deposit-plus-bonus base. Same base, so the multipliers compare directly — which is not true of most pairs. Take the reference case published at break-even table: a €100 deposit, a 100% match, and a 96% RTP slot, a 4% house edge and the game category bonus terms generally steer you onto. Mirax: 35 x (€100 + €100) = €7,000 of required turnover; expected cost 4% of that, €280, against a €100 bonus. Realistic value about minus €180. KatsuBet: 45 x €200 = €9,000; expected cost €360; realistic value about minus €260. Break-even on this base at a 100% match is m/(h(1+m)) = 12.5x. Mirax sits 2.8x over it, KatsuBet 3.6x. The gap is therefore about €80 of expected cost per €100 of bonus, and it scales with the deposit: double the deposit at the same match and you double both bills and the gap between them. Put your own figures through bonus calculator.
Does 45x versus 35x tell you the whole story?
Here it does — and that is only sayable because the bases match. Normally the multiplier alone tells you almost nothing, because the base it applies to decides the bill. Three operators in our archive-verified set show why. BitStarz and mBit both wager 40x on the bonus alone. On the same €100 deposit at a 100% match that is 40 x €100 = €4,000 of turnover, about €160 of expected cost — cheaper than Mirax's 35x, despite the larger headline number. Vavada wagers 35x on the bonus alone: the identical multiplier to Mirax, but €3,500 of turnover against Mirax's €7,000, about €140 of expected cost against €280. Same number printed on the page, half the bill. A deposit-plus-bonus base at a 100% match exactly doubles the turnover, which is why break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and 12.5x on deposit plus bonus. Because Mirax and KatsuBet share the base, the ratio carries straight through: KatsuBet asks for 28.6% more turnover for the same headline offer. Whenever you read a wagering requirement, find the base before you judge the multiplier. What 35x wagering means and what it costs you works through the mechanics.
How much weight should these wagering figures carry?
Both are quoted verbatim from the operators' own bonus-terms pages, retrieved through the Internet Archive and checked mechanically rather than paraphrased from an affiliate summary. That is the strongest sourcing available to us: casino edge networks refuse our requests, so live pages are not fetchable and the archive is the citable record. Its limitation is timing. An archived capture shows what the operator published when the crawler visited, not necessarily what sits on the page today, and welcome packages get rewritten more often than most other terms. We do not treat either figure as a claim about the current live offer, and neither should you. In practice that means one habit before depositing: open the live bonus terms and check two fields — the multiplier, and the base it applies to, bonus alone or deposit plus bonus. Those two decide the cost; the rest of the page is detail. If either operator has changed its base since capture, the ranking here can invert, because moving from deposit-plus-bonus to bonus-only halves the required turnover at a 100% match. Mirax Casino and KatsuBet carry the full quoted findings.
How fast does each one pay out?
We do not know, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. ProvenPayouts does not deposit, does not time cashouts and publishes no test logs, so no hours figure goes next to either name on this page. If another site quotes you one, ask what it was measured from and whether it can show the log behind it. Nor have we verified a published processing-time commitment, a verification turnaround or any queue data at either operator — the things you could actually hold a casino to. Their absence is a finding rather than an omission: nothing archive-verified separates Mirax from KatsuBet on payouts. What is worth knowing as general sector mechanics: crypto casinos of this type typically ask for no identity documents at signup and trigger verification at or near the first withdrawal, at their own discretion. That is where holds appear — when money is leaving, not when it is arriving. That is a pattern of the tier, not a Mirax or KatsuBet finding. Read each operator's own verification and withdrawal-limit terms, since a cap on bonus winnings can cost you more than the wagering multiple does.
What has ProvenPayouts not verified here?
Quite a lot, and listing it is fairer than filling the space. We have not verified either operator's licensing entity or corporate ownership, so we make no claim about whether the two are related. We have not verified game contribution tables, and they matter: where slots count in full and table games count a fraction, a clearing target that looks reachable on slots becomes unreachable at a live table. We have not verified maximum bonus size, minimum qualifying deposit, maximum cashout from bonus winnings, bet caps while wagering, bonus expiry windows, supported coin lists or library size at either operator. We hold no complaint statistics, safety index or resolution record for either, so nothing on this page ranks them on conduct. The ProvenPayouts Score is an editorial judgement formed from public information — not a measurement, not a test result — and we are not using it here to break a tie the evidence does not break. how we rank sets out how it is built. Where you need those missing fields, they are on the operators' own terms pages, and reading them takes less time than clearing a bonus does.
Who does each one actually suit?
Take Mirax if you have already decided to claim a welcome bonus and want the smaller bill for doing it. On the same deposit-plus-bonus base, 35x against 45x is a real saving — about €80 of expected cost per €100 of bonus, scaling with your deposit. That is the one comparison on this page resting entirely on verified figures. We cannot hand you a matching reason to take KatsuBet, because the evidence we hold does not supply one: on wagering it is the more expensive of the two, and on everything else — licensing, conduct record, catalogue, limits — we have verified nothing that separates them. If you are not claiming the bonus at all, the 45x never applies to you, the wagering difference disappears, and this page has nothing verified left to choose with; decide on the live terms and on what each operator publishes about limits and verification. Take neither if you were hoping the arithmetic would come out positive. It does not, at either, at any deposit size: at 35x or 45x on a deposit-plus-bonus base the bonus is a cost you agree to, not value you receive. Stake only what you can afford to lose.
It depends on whether you are claiming the bonus. If you are, Mirax is the cheaper clear on an identical terms structure — 35x against 45x on the same deposit-plus-bonus base, roughly €80 less expected cost per €100 of bonus. Both sit far beyond the 12.5x break-even, so cheaper still means negative. If you are not claiming it, we have verified nothing that separates them: no conduct record, no licensing detail, no published limits. That is not a tie broken in KatsuBet's favour; it is a tie we cannot break. Read the live terms before you deposit.
FAQ
Is Mirax's 35x bonus worth taking?
Not on expectation. Mirax wagers 35x on deposit plus bonus, so a €100 deposit at a 100% match requires €7,000 of turnover. At a 4% house edge — the 96% RTP slots that bonus terms steer you towards — that carries about €280 of expected cost against a €100 bonus, leaving roughly minus €180. Break-even on that base at a 100% match is 12.5x, and 35x sits 2.8x beyond it. It is the cheaper of these two bonuses, which is a different claim from being a good one. Our figure is quoted from Mirax's own archived terms; check the live page before depositing.
Why can 40x at another casino be cheaper than 35x here?
Because the base decides the cost, not the multiplier. BitStarz and mBit both wager 40x on the bonus alone. On a €100 deposit at a 100% match that is 40 x €100 = €4,000 of turnover, about €160 of expected cost at a 4% house edge. Mirax's 35x applies to deposit plus bonus — 35 x €200 = €7,000, about €280. The larger headline number is the cheaper deal, by a wide margin. Break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and 12.5x on deposit plus bonus at a 100% match. break-even table sets out the full model.
What should I check on the live terms before depositing?
Two fields before anything else: the wagering multiplier, and the base it applies to — the bonus alone, or deposit plus bonus. Those decide what the bonus costs you, and a change of base at a 100% match halves or doubles the bill. After that, check game contribution (slots usually count in full, table and live games far less), any maximum cashout from bonus winnings, the maximum bet allowed while wagering, and the expiry window. ProvenPayouts has not verified those last four for Mirax or KatsuBet, so read them on the operator's own terms page rather than from any comparison site, this one included.
How quickly do Mirax and KatsuBet pay out?
We do not know, and we will not guess. ProvenPayouts does not deposit, does not time withdrawals and publishes no test logs, so no hours figure appears next to either name. We have also not verified any published processing-time commitment, verification turnaround or queue data at either operator — the things you could actually hold a casino to. Nothing archive-verified separates Mirax and KatsuBet on payouts, which is itself the finding. If a site quotes you a payout time for either, ask what it was measured from and whether it can show the log behind it.
How reliable are the wagering figures on this page?
Both are quoted verbatim from the operators' own bonus-terms pages, retrieved through the Internet Archive and checked mechanically rather than paraphrased from an affiliate summary. That is the strongest sourcing we have, because casino edge networks refuse our requests and the live pages are not fetchable to us. The limitation is timing: an archived capture shows what was published when the crawler visited, not necessarily what is live today, and welcome packages change. Treat both as sourced but dated, and read the live terms yourself — the multiplier, and the base it applies to — before you deposit.
What does ProvenPayouts not know about Mirax and KatsuBet?
A fair amount, and saying so is part of the point. We have not verified either operator's licensing entity or ownership, so we make no claim about whether they are related. We have not verified game contribution tables, maximum bonus size, minimum qualifying deposit, maximum cashout from bonus winnings, bet caps during wagering, bonus expiry, supported coins or library size. We hold no complaint statistics or safety ratings for either. What we do hold, verbatim from their own archived terms, is the wagering requirement and the base it applies to — the field that decides what a bonus costs.
Other matchups with these two
18+ only. Editorial comparison from public data and archived operator terms — not a first-hand withdrawal test. ProvenPayouts may earn commission on sign-ups; it never changes a score or an ordering, and operators we cannot monetise stay in the ranking anyway.