7Bit Casino vs KatsuBet
Neither welcome bonus can be priced from the terms we hold, so this page does not crown one on cost. 7Bit's archived terms ask 35x and KatsuBet's 45x, but neither says whether the multiplier applies to the bonus alone or to deposit plus bonus, and at a 100 per cent match that clause doubles or halves the bill. We leave both unpriced rather than assume a base. Two things are still safe to say. Both sit past break-even whichever base applies, because at a 4 per cent house edge no base breaks even above 25x, so neither bonus is expected to pay. And if the two use the same base, 7Bit's 35x is the lighter requirement. Beyond those figures we have verified very little about either operator, and where that is true this page says so rather than filling the gap.
| On a £100 deposit, 100% match | 7Bit Casino | KatsuBet |
|---|---|---|
| ProvenPayouts Score | 7.8/10 (Solid) | 7.4/10 (Solid) |
| Wagering (from its own terms) | 35× | 45× |
| Applies to | — | — |
| Break-even on that base | — | — |
| Turnover owed | — | — |
| Expected cost to clear | — | — |
| Realistic value | Cannot be priced | Cannot be priced |
| Terms snapshot | 2024-12-12 | 2022-11-30 |
| Established | 2014 | 2020 |
Every figure above is computed from the operator's own archived terms and the model published at /bonus-break-even, at a 4% house edge. “Not published” and “not readable” are findings, not omissions — where an operator does not state a term, or serves it from a page an archive cannot read, that is said rather than filled in.
7Bit Casino
One of the longest-running crypto casinos, with solid independent trust scores — just watch the withdrawal caps. Editorial assessment, not first-hand tested.
KatsuBet
Reliable-for-its-tier 7Bit sister brand with a strong resolution record; the friction is withdrawal-time verification. Editorial assessment, not first-hand tested.
Which welcome bonus is actually cheaper to clear?
On the terms we hold, that cannot be answered, and the reason is worth understanding. 7Bit's archived bonus terms, captured on 22 November 2024, say all bonuses must be wagered 35 times before funds can be withdrawn. KatsuBet's, captured on 30 November 2022, say the first welcome bonus must be wagered 45 times. Both then carry the same sentence: wagering with both the bonus money and your deposited cash will count towards the wagering requirement. That tells you which bets count towards clearing. It does not tell you what the multiplier is applied to, and that is the number that decides the cost. On a $100 deposit with a 100 per cent match, a multiplier on the bonus alone applies to $100 and a multiplier on deposit plus bonus applies to $200. Without the base there is no turnover figure, so we publish no clearing cost for either and do not choose a base on their behalf. What survives is bounded. At a 4 per cent house edge break-even is 25x on a bonus-only base and 12.5x on deposit plus bonus at a 100 per cent match, never above 25x on either, so 35x and 45x are both past it. And on a shared base 45x asks for about 29 per cent more turnover than 35x. Neither offer is good in expectation.
How do these two sit against the other bonuses we have read?
The multiplier alone tells you almost nothing. The base it applies to decides the cost. Three operators' archived terms state both halves: BitStarz at 40x and mBit at 40x on the bonus alone sit 1.6 times over the 25x bonus-only break-even at a 4 per cent edge, and Vavada at 35x on the bonus alone sits 1.4 times over. 7Bit, Mirax and KatsuBet publish a multiplier (35x, 35x and 45x) but not the base, so we leave all three unpriced. Line those up and the point is hard to miss. Vavada and 7Bit both publish 35x, yet only Vavada's can be costed: about $140 of expected cost on a $100 bonus at a 4 per cent edge. Put the same 35x on deposit plus bonus at a 100 per cent match and the bill would be $280, twice as much for an identical headline. Which of those 7Bit's 35x resembles is exactly what its terms leave out. Between the two casinos on this page, comparing 45x with 35x is only fair once you know both apply to the same base, and neither page of terms says so.
What we have not verified about either casino
Almost everything else you would want in a comparison, we cannot stand behind, so it is not on this page. We have not verified either operator's maximum cashout on bonus winnings, bonus expiry window, game-weighting table or maximum bet while wagering. We have not verified withdrawal processing times, withdrawal fees, or weekly and monthly payout ceilings at either. We have not verified complaint records, review scores, game counts, provider counts, corporate ownership or licence numbers, and we have not established whether the two brands are related to each other. Those are open questions here, not settled ones. A page that filled them with plausible-sounding numbers would be worth less than one that leaves them open, because you would have no way to tell which half was real. For a sense of how thin this ground can get: at two other crypto casinos we track, Gamdom and Rollbit, the terms pages render client-side, so archived captures hold page furniture and no text at all - their wagering terms are unread, and we say so rather than estimating. Here we at least have both multipliers, verbatim, but neither base, so even the bonus stays unpriced.
How much should you trust the two figures that are here?
They are quoted verbatim from each operator's own pages as captured by the Internet Archive, because the live sites are not reachable from our network. A dated capture is a stronger citation than a live URL: a casino can revise its terms silently and the live link still resolves, showing you a document that no longer matches the quote next to it. The cost of that method is staleness, and it applies to both operators here. Terms get rewritten, and the base clause matters more than the multiplier. A 45x on the bonus alone, on a $100 deposit with a $100 bonus, is 4,500 in turnover and about $180 of expected cost; on deposit plus bonus it is 9,000 and $360. One word in the base clause decides more than the number in front of it, and it is the word neither capture on this page contains. So treat each figure as what that operator published at the moment of capture, read the live terms in your own cashier before depositing, and if what you find there differs from what is quoted here, trust the cashier and not us.
Which clauses to read before you accept either bonus
Five, in this order, and the multiplier is only one of them. First the base: bonus alone, or deposit plus bonus. At a 100 per cent match that single distinction doubles the requirement, which is the whole story on this page. Second the multiplier itself. Third game weighting: slots normally count in full while table and live games count a fraction or nothing, so playing anything other than slots quietly multiplies the real turnover you owe. Fourth the maximum bet permitted while wagering. This one is easy to skim past and it sets the shape of the whole exercise - if a $1 ceiling applied to 9,000 of turnover, clearing it means 9,000 separate spins inside whatever expiry window the terms allow. Fifth the maximum cashout on bonus winnings, which caps the upside the requirement is buying. Then check the expiry window against the first four, because a requirement you cannot physically complete in the time allowed is not a requirement, it is a forfeit.
So which should you take, and what would change the answer?
On the evidence we hold, neither on cost, because neither publishes the base its multiplier applies to. Beyond that the two are undecided rather than tied. Three things would settle it, and none of them are things this page can settle for you. First, the base: if both apply the multiplier to the same thing, 7Bit's 35x is the lighter requirement; if they differ, the order can flip, since 45x on a bonus-only base costs less to clear than 35x on deposit plus bonus. Second, a maximum cashout on bonus winnings: a low cap makes a cheap clear close to worthless for anyone chasing a large outcome, and we have not verified either operator's cap. Third, anything on the payout side - approval times, fees, weekly ceilings - which we have not verified either. If the bonus is genuinely why you are choosing between these two, read both base clauses in the live terms first. If it is not, this page has not answered your question, and no honest version of it could on the evidence available.
Undecided on the evidence we hold. 7Bit asks 35x and KatsuBet 45x, but neither set of archived terms says what the multiplier is applied to, so we leave both bonuses unpriced rather than choose a base. Both sit past break-even whichever base applies. If they share a base, 7Bit's is the lighter requirement; the live terms decide whether they do. Payout speed, fees, cashout caps, complaint records and who owns either brand are all unverified, and any one of them could matter more to you than the multiplier. Read the live terms and the licensing yourself before depositing.
FAQ
Which has the cheaper welcome bonus, 7Bit or KatsuBet?
We cannot say from the terms we hold. 7Bit's archived terms ask 35x and KatsuBet's 45x, but neither states whether the multiplier applies to the bonus alone or to deposit plus bonus, so we price neither and do not assume a base. If both apply it to the same base, 7Bit's is the lighter requirement: KatsuBet's 45x asks for about 29 per cent more turnover. Either way both are past break-even at a 4 per cent house edge, where no base breaks even above 25x, so neither bonus is a way to make money. Read the base clause on each live bonus page before comparing them.
Why does the wagering base matter more than the multiplier?
Because the base decides how much money the multiplier is applied to. A 45x requirement on the bonus alone, from a $100 deposit with a $100 bonus, means 4,500 in turnover. The same 45x on deposit plus bonus means 9,000 - exactly double, because a 100 per cent match doubles the base. That is why 40x on a bonus-only base is materially cheaper to clear than 35x on deposit plus bonus, despite the larger headline number. Read the base clause before the multiplier; the model at break-even table sets out the arithmetic.
Are 7Bit and KatsuBet the same company?
We do not know. We have verified each operator's wagering terms from archived copies of their own pages and nothing else - not corporate owner, not licence number, not whether the two brands are related. Claims about shared ownership circulate widely for crypto-casino brands, and we are not repeating ones we have not confirmed. If you are splitting a bankroll across two sites specifically to spread counterparty risk, treat the question as open and check each operator's own licensing disclosure before depositing, rather than relying on this page.
Does ProvenPayouts test withdrawals at these casinos?
No. We do not deposit, do not time cashouts and publish no test logs, at these two or anywhere else. That is why this page carries no withdrawal times, fees or payout limits for either operator: we have not verified them, so they are not here. The only operator-specific figures published above are the wagering multiplier for each and the sentence each uses about which bets count, quoted verbatim from archived copies of their own terms pages. The ProvenPayouts Score is likewise an editorial judgement built from public evidence, not a measurement of anything.
How do these two compare with the other bonuses ProvenPayouts has verified?
Three operators' archived terms state both the multiplier and its base, all on the bonus alone: BitStarz 40x, mBit 40x and Vavada 35x, which is 1.6, 1.6 and 1.4 times over the 25x break-even at a 4 per cent edge. Vavada's 35x on the bonus alone is the mildest requirement we can price. 7Bit (35x), Mirax (35x) and KatsuBet (45x) publish a multiplier but no base, so we leave them unpriced. All six multipliers sit above break-even whichever base applies, because at a 4 per cent edge no base breaks even above 25x.
Is there any case for choosing KatsuBet over 7Bit?
Not on anything we have verified, and not on the bonus either, since neither operator states its base. The usual argument for accepting a higher multiplier rests on other clauses - a lighter base, an uncapped maximum cashout, a longer expiry, friendlier game weighting - and we will not assert any of those in KatsuBet's favour. If you are chasing a large outcome rather than grinding a bonus down, read both base clauses and both maximum-cashout clauses in the live terms yourself. Those, not the multiplier, decide which bonus costs less.
Other matchups with these two
BitStarz vs 7Bit Casino
BitStarz wagers 40x on the bonus alone. 7Bit publishes 35x but not the base it applies to, so we price BitStarz's bonus and leave 7Bit's unpriced.
Mirax Casino vs KatsuBet
Mirax publishes 35x and KatsuBet 45x, but neither set of archived terms says what the multiplier applies to, so we leave both unpriced and explain what that clause changes.
18+ only. Editorial comparison from public data and archived operator terms — not a first-hand withdrawal test. ProvenPayouts may earn commission on sign-ups, and operators we cannot monetise stay in the ranking anyway.