Which of these two costs less?
Every pair compared on the one thing that can actually be priced: what the bonus costs to clear, computed from each operator's own archived terms. Where a term is not published, that is said rather than guessed — and on some pairs the fact that one side cannot be priced at all is the most useful thing on the page.
A lower multiplier is not automatically the better offer. 35× applied to deposit + bonus costs far more than 40× applied to the bonus alone, because the base doubles. Of the 6 operators whose own terms publish both figures, every one prices above its break-even point — the table shows by how much.
BitStarz vs 7Bit Casino
40× vs 35×BitStarz wagers 40x on the bonus alone, 7Bit 35x on deposit plus bonus. At a 100 per cent match the lower number costs about 1.75x more to clear.
7Bit Casino vs KatsuBet
35× vs 45×Both wager on deposit plus bonus. 7Bit asks 35x, KatsuBet 45x - on a $100 deposit that is $280 of expected cost against $360. 7Bit is the cheaper clear.
Vavada vs BitStarz
35× vs 40×Both wager on the bonus alone — Vavada 35x, BitStarz 40x — so Vavada's bonus runs about $20 cheaper per $100. Its 2021-archived 10x cashout cap is the catch.
Mirax Casino vs KatsuBet
35× vs 45×Both wager on deposit plus bonus, so 35x versus 45x compares directly: about €280 of expected clearing cost per €100 of bonus at Mirax, €360 at KatsuBet.
BitStarz vs mBit
40× vs 40×Both require 40x wagering on the bonus alone, verified from archived terms, so the two offers cost the same to clear. Beyond that, we verify nothing.
Stake vs BitStarz
not published vs 40×BitStarz publishes 40x on the bonus alone, so it can be priced. Stake publishes a base but no multiplier, so it cannot. The arithmetic, and what stays unknown.
Stake vs Rollbit
not published vs not publishedStake publishes a bonus base but no readable multiplier; Rollbit's terms defeat the archive. Neither bonus can be priced, so choose on product and recourse.
Stake vs Gamdom
not published vs not publishedNeither can be priced against break-even: Stake publishes a wagering base but no multiplier, and Gamdom's terms could not be read from the archive at all.
Stake vs Vave
not published vs not publishedStake is the safer default: longer record, named licensee, real national licences. Vave is newer, 1.6/5 on Trustpilot. Neither bonus can be priced.
Gamdom vs Rollbit
not published vs not publishedNeither Gamdom nor Rollbit serves bonus terms an archive can read, so neither offer can be priced from outside. What that gap should change for you.
Where to go next
18+ only. Editorial comparisons from public data and archived operator terms — not first-hand withdrawal tests. ProvenPayouts may earn commission on sign-ups; it never changes a score or an ordering.